www.fransvanschooten.nl

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional and Exceptional Units

The search for pre-defined units within the octagonal grid began with the twelve units identified by Harmsen, based on the work of al-Kashi. Most Anatolian muqarnas include two additional units, bringing the total to fourteen, as shown in Table 1. Later, Sakkal proposed many more, and my own list of permutations supports his insights. This webpage presents exceptional muqarnas examples that go beyond Table 1.

One type of irregularity involves using the same shape in multiple sizes, as seen in the muqarnas of Diyarbakir's Kasim Padisah Mosque. Another occurs when only half a unit is needed-either the left or right side-rather than the full element.

 

This webpage:

Related webpages:

 

My Collection for the Octagonal Grid

Over time, my collection of pre-defined units for the octagonal grid kept growing-eventually expanding to include all possible permutations. The current list has gone far beyond what al-Kashi and his followers might have imagined. Early on, I assumed the list of permutations was too restrictive and dismissed certain shapes simply because I didn't expect them. That was a mistake. There's clearly room for less conventional units like BC and Qn. For example, the rectangular top unit in the mihrab muqarnas of the Istanbul Üsküdar Marmara University Theology Faculty Mosque is an instance of Qn. The broad rhombus-shaped unit BC can be seen in the muqarnas of Diyarbakır's Melek Ahmet Pasa Mosque.

top
 


Hexagonal and decagonal grids

While my webpages focus primarily on the octagonal grid, it's important to note that other grid systems-such as hexagonal and decagonal grids-are also used in muqarnas design. Both Tuncer and Ödekan have documented numerous examples that follow these alternative structures.

top
 


Reductions and enlargments

One type of irregularity arises when the same unit shape appears in different sizes-as seen in the mihrab muqarnas of the Kasim Padisah Mosque in Diyarbakır, located above the last congregation mihrab. This muqarnas rests on an octagonal base. The orange jug-shaped unit D occurs in three different sizes. In the second tier from the top, the jug is reduced to fit onto the purple base unit in the third tier, which features larger-than-normal jugs. In the fourth and sixth tiers, the jug returns to its standard size. So, it's three times the same unit D, but each with a different scale factor. These scaling factors can be calculated using basic algebra and typically result in nested square roots, such as the square root of a square root.

4

4

4

4

top
 


Stretching an Octagon to a Square

I've seen muqarnas with octagonal plans and others with rectangular or square layouts, and I began experimenting to understand the differences between these forms. One question I explored was whether an octagonal plan could be stretched into a square without affecting the upper tiers of the muqarnas. For example, take a small niche muqarnas in the Kasim Padisah Mosque in Diyarbakır. Tuncer provided a floor plan, which I checked on-site in 2022. Squaring the plan isn't too difficult: the corners are filled with small dome-like elements. I found that I could close the dome by placing two opposing base units; the intermediates K from Table 1. But in reality, these elements might be constructed differently. Similar small domed transitions appear in other buildings as well-like the Kasimiye Medrese in Mardin, as shown by Ödekan, or in the Elbasi Karatay Han in Kayseri.

top
 


Rectangular Top

Many muqarnas feature a star-shaped pattern at the top, which is the most common way to close the structure. A rectangular second tier, however, is rare-but it can be done. A good example is the mihrab muqarnas of the Üsküdar Marmara University Theology Faculty Mosque in Istanbul. Its top tier forms a star, made of rhombuses split at a 90° angle. These rhombuses are constructed from three upper units of type T, flanked by a left half-T and a right half-T, rather than the more typical upper unit N resting on a base unit M. Only two of the T units actually form a complete rhombus-where the upper unit T rests on a base unit U. To achieve the rectangular form, the central T rests on half of a hypothetical upper unit Qn, which does not exist on its own because its 45° interior angle is too narrow. The flanking T units rest on half of a base unit I.

top
 


Fat Rhombus

In the Melek Ahmet Pasa Mosque in Diyarbakır, the third tier from the top features a rare rhombus-shaped unit. Together with the biped-shaped unit below it-in the fourth tier-it forms a kite-like composite shape, where the rhombus is the upper part and the biped is the base. Unlike a standard rhombus, which typically has 135° angles, this one has a sharper 112.5° angle. Its length is also shorter than the standard unit length, allowing it to fit against the back of the standard jug-shaped unit. The corresponding biped unit below deviates as well: instead of the usual 135° angle at the front and 90° at the back, this version has a 112.5° front angle and a 67.5° back angle. This muqarnas also shows another kind of irregularity: the top three tiers are built with smaller-scale units, while the bottom three tiers use larger ones. The tier with the broad rhombuses acts as a kind of glue, visually and structurally binding the upper and lower sections together.

top
 


Corner Stone

One of the rare parts is a corner stone, usually applied in the bottom tier. Once, I modelled the corner as the combination of a square Aand two half units F to fil the gap.. Mamoun Sakkal mentioned an alternative building block for corners that comprises the whole combination. I call it Oo.

The Bursa Hacılar mihrab muqarnas has many squares. In the corners, I need a combination of predefined building blocks, including a slightly smaller square. Here a corner stone Oo would be more appropriate.

  • Bursa Harcilar

    Bursa Hacilar Cami Mihrab had a restauration. The corners have a dedicated cornerstone.

top
 


Pentagons

Muqarnas are ornamental features of Islamic architecture. Their 2D floor plans resemble tessellations of squares, rhombuses and kites. However, these plans often oversimplify the spatial complexity, losing key details. The underlying grid may be octagonal, hexagonal or decagonal, but in the larger Seljuk and Ottoman muqarnas, pentagonal or heptagonal shapes are added. Mathematically, it's impossible to fit regular pentagons or hexagons into a strict octagonal grid. Yet, muqarnas defy these constraints, blending art and geometry. For instance, the portal muqarnas of the Atik Valide Mosque in Üsküdar, Istanbul (16th-century), features pentagonal and hexagonal püskül embedded within an otherwise octagonal grid.

Tuncer's floor plans of Diyarbakır do not have pentagons, but Ödekan's thesis has examples. My favorite example is Istanbul Üsküdar Atik Valide, the 16th century Ottoman imperial mosque, designed by the architect Mimar Sinan for Nurbanu Sultan, the wife of Sultan Selim II. The portal muqarnas has both pentagons and hexagons. See also the discussion of Agirnbas ellipses.

Before the conquest of Istanbul, Bursa was the capital of the Ottoman Empire. Bursa is known for the Yesil Cami, but the Muradiye Tomb Complex is just as interesting. Although the Yesil Cami and the Muradiye Tomb Complex date from the same period, the muqarnas compositions are very different. The muqarnas of Yesil Cami are entirely in line with later Ottoman muqarnas, but those of the Tomb Complex appear somewhat clumsy in comparison.